We work with all sorts of clients, from large corporations to small start-ups and families, providing a truly personal service to each and every one.


From academies and agriculture to travel and tourism, our clients come from all corners of business. Our team of experts provides experience and advice to businesses in a variety of sectors.

About us

Forrester Boyd is one of the largest independent chartered accountancy practices in Lincolnshire and the Humber region. Our focus on people, both clients and employees, is at the heart of our success.

Meet the team


Now based in six offices across Lincolnshire and the Humber region, our teams are perfectly placed to work closely with you. Please don't hesitate to get in touch.

What is ‘substantial extent’ for non-trading activities?

  • 16th March 2022

Gains that qualify for business asset disposal relief (BADR) are taxed at a reduced rate of 10%, but relief for company shares is not available if the underlying company carries on substantial non-trading activities. HMRC has long applied a strict 20% test, but a recent Upper Tribunal case has forced HMRC to backpedal and further clarify the interpretation of 'substantial'.

In Assem Allam vs. HMRC [2021] UKUT 0291, the Upper Tribunal found that previous HMRC guidance using a simple 80/20 test of trading versus non-trading activity is not always going to produce the correct answer when deciding if the relief is available. HMRC guidance has not completely done away with the 20% test, but less emphasis is now placed on it.

In any dispute with HMRC, it is important to remember that a decision of the Upper Tribunal makes the law, but HMRC guidance does not have the force of law.

Upper Tribunal approach

The Upper Tribunal concluded that the legislation does not provide for a strict numeric test. The test of whether non-trading activities are substantial is a holistic one not confined to physical human activity, but requires an overall consideration of what it is that the company does.

Other factors than those listed in HMRC’s guidance can also be relevant.

HMRC guidance

HMRC’s revised guidance now states that the 20% test is only likely to be relevant when considering the level of non-trading income and the value of a company’s non-trading assets. If neither exceed 20%, HMRC will generally accept that the relief is available without further enquiry.

  • Also relevant is the proportion of expenses spent on non-trading activities, as well as the amount of time and resources incurred.
  • The relevant factors should be considered over a company’s history, not just at one point in time; particularly if trade is seasonal.

Having investment property may therefore preclude claiming BADR. However, there is a bit more leeway when it comes to a large cash balance because it may be argued out of the equation as being required for trading purposes.

HMRC’s guidance on the meaning of ‘substantial’ can be found here within their capital gains manual.

If you would like any help or advice on any of the information within this article please do get in touch.

Any news or resources within this section should not be relied upon with regards to figures or data referred to as legislative and policy changes may have occurred.